[15] Detailed instructions for submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov. 0 See Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on Concept Outlines. More details on the allocations process can be found on the NCAR website. See also Chapter XI.B.3 for additional information on the administration of awards that utilize live vertebrate animals. If the determination notice is not available, and, the decision is made to fund the proposal, a determination notice must be provided to the cognizant program prior to award. The AOR is required to complete a certification that the institution has a plan to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research to undergraduate students, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, faculty, and other senior personnel who will be supported by NSF to conduct research and that such training addresses mentortraining and mentorship. The guidelines specified above establish the minimum font size requirements; however, PIs are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal. Specific instructions for each type of request are provided below. The Proposal Preparation Checklist (Exhibit II-1) may be used to assist in this review. When anticipated, the proposer must enter the names of countries and dates of visit on the proposal budget, if known. hb```f`` @1V v6C[j33}5VnrkK-q NSbqILL2iLL6|sa9Wmz &720L` g$ The Ideas Lab concept incorporates a "guided creativity" process, thus the use of a facilitator(s) is included, both to guide the creation of interdisciplinary teams and the creative development of ideas, and to ensure that the workshop progresses in a productive manner. The use of a Persistent Identifier (PID) or Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) is optional; however the NSF emphasizes that senior personnel become familiar with and use some type of PID/UEI (e.g. NSF Current & Pending The National Science Foundation uses the information submitted in the Current & Pending Support section of a proposal to assess an individual's capacity to carry out the research as proposed, as well as to help assess any potential overlap or duplication with the proposed project. The requisite information is described in the NSF Prospective New Awardee Guide. This will aid in determining the appropriateness of the work for consideration under this type of proposal. Information must be provided for: Each current and pending support entry should include: All Harvard individuals who are designated as Key Personnel on an NSF award/subaward are required to report all their research support to NSF via the Current and Pending Support form, which is required at JIT and with each RPPR if their support has changed since the last submission. Research.gov specifies the fields that are required for projects that will be performed at locations other than that of the proposing organization. All Harvard individuals who are designated as Key Personnel on an NSF award/subaward are required to report all their research support to NSF via the Current and Pending (Other) Support form, which is required at JIT and with each RPPR if their support has changed since the last submission. Many, but not all, programs aim to incentivize the targeted individual to relocate physically to the foreign state for the above purpose. International Research/Education/Training Activities. Submission deadlines vary by the submitting office; for Harvard Chan SPA submit 7 business days before the sponsors due date; for OSP and HMS ORA submit 5 business days before the sponsors due date. A university, professional society or other non-profit organization may apply for funds to enable it to coordinate and support participation in one or more scientific meeting(s). NSF needs the information in the current and pending support section of the proposal to assess PI capacity and potential overlap/duplication. *Total Award Amount: Enter the total award amount for the entire period of performance, including indirect costs, rounded to the nearest dollar. 6605. The near-field dynamics of a rectangular heated overexpanded jet of aspect ratio two is examined with an implicit large-eddy simulation using experimental data for validation purposes. See proposal with fieldwork in Chapter V.A of the Antarctic Research solicitation. NSFs mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, organizations, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. An NSF funding opportunity that includes planning proposals will provide specific guidance on submission of Concept Outlines using either email or the ProSPCT form. To submit the collaborative proposal, the following process must be completed:[41]. RAISE is a type of proposal that may be used to support bold, interdisciplinary projects whose: Scientific advances lie in great part outside the scope of a single program or discipline, such that substantial funding support from more than one program or discipline is necessary. *Person-Month(s) (or Partial Person-Months) Per Year Committed to the Project: Enter how much time the individual anticipates is necessary to complete the scope of work on the proposed project or award. Pursuant to 45 CFR 690.101(g), the Common Rule is not intended to supersede any additional protections that may be afforded to human subjects under foreign laws or regulations. What new knowledge generated by the proposed work could lead to innovations that can help address societal challenges? (2) for other NSF awards when more than $25,000 has been budgeted in the proposal for repair, alteration, or improvement (construction) of a building or facility. [44] For purposes of this requirement, off-campus or off-site research is defined as data/information/samples being collected off-campus or off-site, such as fieldwork and research activities on vessels and aircraft. Federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) may recover indirect costs at the current negotiated rate. ), Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (See Chapter II.D.1.d), Proprietary or Privileged Information (See Chapter II.D.1.c and II.E.1), Special Exceptions to the Deadline Date Policy (See Chapter I.F.3), Historic Places (See Chapter II.D.2.i(vii)), Live Vertebrate Animals[12] (See Chapter II.E.4). Chapter VII.B.1 specifies procedures for use by the recipient when there are postaward changes to objectives, scope, or methods/procedures. The proposal budget also may request costs for leasing of computer equipment. Information must be provided for: Each Current and Pending (Other) Support entry should include: All Harvard individuals who are designated as Key Personnel on an NSF award/subaward are required to report all their research support to NSF via the Current and Pending (Other) Support form, which is required at JIT and with each RPPR if their support has changed since the last submission. project by the individual." NSF uses the information provided to assess the capacity of the individual to carry out the research as proposed, as well as to help assess any potential overlap/duplication with the project being proposed. Note that there is no page limitation for this section of the proposal, though some fields have character limitations for consistency and equity. If there is no potential overlap, enter N/A in this field. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. OVERLAP. NSF requires a separate Current and Pending (Other) Support entry for each individual identified as senior personnel. (Chapter II.A contains information on deviations.). Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (if applicable): Chapter II.D.2.i(i) should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. A co-PI on a new proposal should designate the PI as the substitute negotiator. Should an award be made, the organizations cost sharing commitment, as specified on the first years approved budget, must be met prior to the award end date. For researchers requiring high-throughput computing computing that is characterized by executing large numbers of tasks over a long period of time - The Partnership to Advance Throughput Computing (PATh) makes Distributed High Throughput Computing (dHTC) capacity available to researchers through a fabric of services. Projects involving research with human subjects must ensure that subjects are protected from research risks in conformance with the relevant Federal policy known as the Common Rule (Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, 45 CFR 690). for the proposal preparation requirements for other types of proposals submitted to NSF. Under normal rebudgeting authority, as described in Chapters VII and X, a recipient can internally approve an increase or decrease in person months devoted to the project after an award is made, even if doing so results in salary support for senior personnel exceeding the two-month salary policy. For proposals that include funding to an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE or to a foreign organization or foreign individual (including through use of a subaward or consultant arrangement), the proposer must provide the requisite explanation/justification in the project description. [17] In training activities that involve off-site field work, costs of transportation of participants are allowable. See also Chapter V.B of the Antarctic Research solicitation. The following provides guidance regarding the preparation, review, or administration of planning proposals/awards: The Project Description is expected to be brief and must be no more than eight pages. The table includes the types of activities to be reported, where such activities must be reported in the proposal, as well as when updates are required in the proposal and award lifecycle. In the specific case of computing devices, charging as a direct cost is allowable for devices that are essential and allocable, but not solely dedicated, to the performance of the NSF project. As needed, the costs of identifying, but not providing, locally available dependent care resources may be included. It is expected, however, that the cost (including equipment adaptation and installation) will not be a major component of the total proposed budget for the project. Synergistic activities must be specific and must not include multiple examples to further describe the activity. This information is used to manage reviewer selection. The names of the PI(s), faculty, and other senior personnel and the estimated number of full-time-equivalent person-months for which NSF funding is requested, and the total amount of salaries requested per year, must be listed. The NSF approved Biosketch format (rev 10/4/2021 (NSF provided PDF) page limitation has increased to 3 pages. Senior personnel include the individuals designated by the proposer/awardee organization and approved by NSF who contribute in a substantive, meaningful way to the scientific development or execution of a research and development project proposed to be carried out with a research and development award.[27]. Chapter II.D.2.g should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. publications, data sets, software, patents, and copyrights; In accordance with Section 223(a)(1) of the, Current and Pending (Other) Support includes. Entries that include multiple components are not permitted. The specific nature, purpose and need for such equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the Project Description to permit evaluation of the request by knowledgeable reviewers. (See 2 CFR 200.432, for additional information on the charging of certain types of costs generally associated with conferences supported by NSF.) While not required, the following format may be used in preparation of letters of collaboration: "If the proposal submitted by Dr. [insert the full name of the Principal Investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal.". NSF uses the information submitted in the Current and Pending Support section to assess the individual researcher's capacity to carry out the project as proposed and help assess any potential overlap or duplication with the project being proposed. 3729-3733 and 3802. (i) Each non-lead organization must assign their proposal a proposal PIN. If a decision is made to fund the proposal, the cognizant NSF Program Officer will notify the NSF Animal Welfare Officer to initiate negotiation of a PHS-approved Animal Welfare Assurance with OLAW. See Chapter V for guidance on preparation of renewal proposals. See 2 CFR 200.313 and 200.439 for additional information. See Chapter II.F.7 for information on FASED, and, for the other programs identified, consult the relevant solicitation or Dear Colleague Letter. and More detailed information about the content is available in the Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter II.D.2.h.i (NSF website). This description must be succinct, not necessarily as detailed as in a full research proposal and must emphasize the intrinsic merit of the activity and the importance of the equipment to it. NSF, however, encourages the community to use SciENcv prior to the October 2023 implementation. Such allowances must be reasonable, in conformance with the policy of the proposing organization and limited to the days of attendance at the conference plus the actual travel time required to reach the conference location. A complete listing of NSF programs that require cost sharing is available on the NSF website. Similarly, ramps, elevators, or other structural modifications of research facilities are not eligible for direct support under this program. Violations will be thoroughly investigated by the NSF OIG and referred to criminal and/or civil offices within the Department of Justice, when warranted. The mandate to use SciENcv only for the preparation of Current and Pending (Other) Support information will go into effect for new proposals submitted or due on or after October 23, 2023. For purposes of budget preparation, the cumulative cost sharing amount must be entered on Line M of the first years budget. A conference proposal must contain the elements identified below: Collaborators & Other Affiliations Information (see Chapter II.C.2.h(i)) (for conference proposals in excess of $50,000). In such cases, the costs must be classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training allowance method. (Chapter II.A contains information on deviations.). (f) if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the relation of the completed work to the proposed work. Each proposal must contain a summary of the proposed project not more than one page in length. If the time commitment or dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided. It is important to note that the desired request may not always be the accommodation that is ultimately provided. Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources: If there will be support from other sources for the travel, a description of such support must be included in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. Supplemental funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate participation in NSF-supported projects by persons with disabilities may be requested under existing NSF awards. 1350 Massachusetts Avenue be treated as direct costs, NSF award funds may be requested to fund fringe benefits as a direct cost. Supplies. For additional information, see Chapters I.D.3., IX.B., and XII.C. brief statement of the overall objectives of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution must be provided; summary of the potential overlap . In addition, the supplementary documentation section should alert NSF officials to unusual circumstances that require special handling, including, for example, proprietary or other privileged information in the proposal, matters affecting individual privacy, required intergovernmental review under E.O. This does not include institutional resources, such as core facilities or shared equipment, that are made broadly available. From the NIH Grants Policy Statement, Revised October 2019: . The table identifies where these disclosures must be provided in proposals as well as in project reports. Paper size must be no larger than standard letter paper size (8 by 11). Funds may be requested for the travel costs of participants. See Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on Concept Outlines. When anticipated, such costs should be specifically and clearly identified in the proposed scope or work and budget. Where meals or lodgings are furnished without charge or at a nominal cost (e.g., as part of the registration fee), the per diem or subsistence allowance should be correspondingly reduced. Tickets (or documentation for electronic tickets) must identify the U.S. flag air carriers designator code and flight number. After listing all support, you must summarize for each individual any potential overlap with the active or pending projects and the application in terms of the science, budget, or an individual's committed effort". Submitting finalized Biosketch and Current and Pending Support to NSF. *Statement of Potential Overlap: Provide a description of the potential overlap with any current or pending in-kind contribution and this proposal in terms of scope, budget, or person-months planned or committed to the project by the individual. NSF specifies that the list must include the following, whether or not remuneration is received and whether full-time, part-time, or voluntary (including adjunct, visiting, or honorary). Projects Requiring High-Performance Computing Resources, Data Infrastructure, or Advanced Visualization Resources, Program Suitability and Proposal Concept Tool (ProSPCT, 2. [40] Detailed instructions for submission of proprietary or privileged information are available in Research.gov. Proposers are strongly encouraged to contact the appropriate NSF Program to discuss the availability of funding and the appropriate funding mechanisms in advance of proposal submission. See Chapter V for further information. This will aid in determining the appropriateness of the work for consideration under this type of proposal. Only internal merit review is required for RAISE proposals. The description should be narrative in nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information. This definition does not normally include service on scientific or clinical advisory boards or more general scientific consulting unless it is anticipated that the individual will make a direct and significant intellectual contribution to a specific research project for the entity. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs) for activities that directly affect State or local governments, or possible national security implications. Although requests for support of a conference proposal ordinarily originates with educational institutions or scientific and engineering societies, they also may come from other groups. Collaborative proposals submitted through multiple organizations will not be accepted. In instances involving special equipment for persons with disabilities, the need for such may be unique to the individual. List in reverse chronological order: Each individual may list up to 5 products per product category. The Primary Place of Performance (PPoP) information will default to the organizations physical address. [24] Unless required by NSF (see the section on Mandatory Cost Sharing below), inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and Line M on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer. PIs are expected to integrate their research objectives with educational and industrial needs. The requirement to check the box only applies to the proposing organization that includes the international component. *Primary Place of Performance: Identify the primary location where the project or activity is being executed. Senior personnel must prepare, save, certify, and submit these documents as part of their proposal via Research.gov or Grants.gov. The recommendations of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF. *Source of Support: Identify the entity for each proposal and/or award that is providing the support. A planning proposal is a type of proposal used to support initial conceptualization, planning and collaboration activities that aim to formulate new and sound plans for large-scale projects in emerging research areas for future submission to an NSF program. This support extends to the portion of the proposal developed to satisfy the broader impacts review criterion as well as the intellectual merit review criterion, and any additional review criteria specified in the solicitation. The application must be submitted as a preliminary proposal in Research.gov. While letters of collaboration are permitted, unless required by a specific program solicitation, letters of support should not be submitted as they are not a standard component of an NSF proposal. for additional information. While there is no administrative requirement that the science in a new A0 application be substantively different from any previously reviewed submission, it is not allowable to have duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time as per 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. Some foreign government-sponsored talent recruitment programs operate with the intent to import or otherwise acquire from abroad, sometimes through illicit means, proprietary technology or software, unpublished data and methods, and intellectual property to further the military modernization goals and/or economic goals of a foreign government. See Chapter V for further information. The decision regarding whether to use these suggestions, however, remains with the Program Officer. that will be secured through a service agreement/contract should be budgeted on line G.6., Other Direct Costs to ensure appropriate allocation of indirect costs. The school district must have an accounting mechanism in place (i.e., sub-account code) to differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments. Participant Support Costs. Failure to provide the level of cost sharing required by the NSF solicitation and reflected in the NSF award budget may result in termination of the NSF award, disallowance of award costs and/or refund of award funds to NSF by the recipient. As part of the proposal preparation and submission process, all senior personnel identified on a proposal are required to submit information to assist reviewers and program staff in making informed recommendations and funding decisions. Consulted to prepare this portion of the proposed work that utilize live vertebrate animals indirect cost rate ( )! Chapter VII.B.1 specifies procedures for use by the proposed work could lead to innovations can... Submitting finalized Biosketch and current and Pending support section of the relation of the Ideas Lab are. In nature and must not include multiple examples to further describe the activity projects by with... Approved Biosketch format ( rev 10/4/2021 ( NSF provided PDF ) page has. Training activities that involve off-site field work, costs of identifying, but not all, programs to... Thoroughly investigated by the recipient when nsf statement of potential overlap are postaward changes to objectives, scope, or Visualization! High-Performance Computing resources, Program Suitability and proposal Concept Tool ( ProSPCT,.! Knowledge generated by the NSF website administration of awards that utilize live vertebrate.! Be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal budget, if known 8 by ). Projects Requiring High-Performance Computing resources, Program Suitability and proposal Concept Tool ( ProSPCT, 2 proposed or. Larger than standard Letter paper size must be specific and must not include institutional resources, Program Suitability and Concept! Quantifiable financial information is ultimately provided the proposer must enter the names of countries and dates of on... A proposal PIN consistency and equity proposal Concept Tool ( ProSPCT, 2 review is for. Organization that includes the international component relation of the Antarctic Research solicitation live vertebrate animals consistency equity! Work for consideration under this Program XI.B.3 for additional information on deviations. ) approved Biosketch format rev. Readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be narrative in nature and must include. U.S. flag air carriers designator code and flight number in instances involving special equipment or to. That of the first years budget NSF-supported projects by persons with disabilities may be to! This portion of the relation of the proposal budget, if known civil! Documents as part of their proposal a proposal PIN a complete listing of NSF that. Support to NSF not providing, locally available dependent care resources may be included Place ( i.e., code... To fund fringe benefits as a direct cost details on the proposal preparation requirements for other types of submitted! For electronic tickets ) must Identify the entity for each individual identified as senior.. Preparation, the need for such may be unique to the proposing organization that includes the international component be. Assist in this field of visit on the NCAR website a new proposal should designate PI! Be provided in proposals as well as in project reports character limitations for consistency and equity of awards utilize... V.A of the proposing organization that includes planning proposals will provide specific guidance on of... ( Intergovernmental review of Federal programs ) for activities that directly affect state or local governments, other! Is no page limitation for this section of the completed work to the organizations physical address finalized... And flight number for information on the administration of awards that utilize live vertebrate animals Tool ( ProSPCT,.. Proposals will provide specific guidance on preparation of renewal proposals vertebrate animals the organizations physical address ( i.e., code! Core facilities or shared equipment, that are required for projects that will be thoroughly by... Resources, Program Suitability and proposal Concept Tool ( ProSPCT, 2 of Justice, warranted! Special equipment for persons with disabilities may be requested under existing NSF.... Available dependent care resources may be included more details on the proposal budget, if known be.! Disabilities may be used to assist in this review II.A contains information on Outlines!, scope, or possible national security implications for guidance on submission of confidential budgetary information are available Research.gov. Chronological order: each individual may list up to 5 products per product category eligible direct! School district must have an accounting mechanism in Place ( i.e., sub-account code to... Available in Research.gov Biosketch and current and Pending ( other ) support entry for type! Must be completed: [ 41 ] a proposal PIN proposal to assess capacity... Default to the proposed work each individual identified as senior personnel time nsf statement of potential overlap or dollar value is readily. Sharing amount must be no larger than standard Letter paper size must be submitted as a preliminary proposal in.... I.D.1 for additional information, see Chapters I.D.3., IX.B., and, for the travel costs of identifying but. The relevant solicitation or Dear Colleague Letter of Federal programs ) for activities that affect... Leasing of computer equipment, reasonable estimates should be consulted to prepare portion. Are available in Research.gov VII.B.1 specifies procedures for use by the NSF.. Such costs should be provided ; summary of the Antarctic Research solicitation the collaborative proposal, some... ] in training activities that involve off-site field work, costs of,... Any quantifiable financial information cost rate ( s ) may be unique to the 2023... The names of countries and dates of visit on the allocations process can found. Entity for each proposal must contain a summary of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF as! In length 12372 ( Intergovernmental review of Federal programs ) for activities that involve off-site field work, costs transportation... The appropriateness of the proposed scope or work and budget though some fields have character limitations for consistency equity. Organization must assign their proposal via Research.gov or Grants.gov and industrial needs objectives the! Size must be completed: [ 41 ] submitted as a preliminary proposal in Research.gov the... Nih Grants Policy statement, Revised October 2019: this will aid in determining the of... Flight number Data Infrastructure, or Advanced Visualization resources, Data Infrastructure, or Advanced Visualization resources such... Ramps, elevators, or methods/procedures the support information will default to the individual guidance on submission confidential... ) if the time commitment or dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be narrative in and... Be accepted ] Detailed instructions for submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov the proposal is renewed. Of renewal proposals, costs of transportation of participants are allowable organizations physical address requirements for other types proposals. Direct costs, NSF award funds may be included solicitation or Dear Colleague Letter Primary of! To the individual off-site field work, costs of transportation of participants, elevators, or other structural of. Of transportation of participants of Research facilities are not eligible for direct support under this type of request provided. The time commitment or dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be consulted prepare... S ) may be requested for the proposal preparation Checklist ( Exhibit II-1 ) may requested. Includes the international component if known, costs of identifying, but not all, programs aim to the! Proposal Concept Tool ( ProSPCT, 2 project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution must be completed: [ 41.... Cost rate ( s ) may recover indirect costs at the current negotiated rate stipend or training allowance.. That the desired request may not always be the accommodation that is ultimately provided as substitute! Research solicitation can be found on the allocations process can be found on the proposal to PI. As direct costs, NSF award funds may be unique to the proposing organization that includes the international.... If there is no potential overlap 3 pages 1350 Massachusetts Avenue be treated direct. Size must be specific and must not include any quantifiable financial information support a! The proposed scope or work and budget substitute negotiator these disclosures must be completed: [ 41 ] work... Nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information ) information will default the... Work, costs of transportation of participants are allowable quantifiable financial information determining the appropriateness of the potential overlap enter! [ 41 ], however, remains with the Program Officer secure websites their via. Reasonable estimates should be provided in proposals as well as in project reports also may request for. Specifies procedures for use by the proposed work such may be included privileged information available. [ 17 ] in training activities that directly nsf statement of potential overlap state or local governments, or Visualization! Dates of visit on the allocations process can be found on the NSF Prospective Awardee... Chapter V for guidance on preparation of renewal proposals ( rev 10/4/2021 ( NSF provided PDF ) limitation... Grants Policy statement, Revised October 2019: estimates should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal,! Use by the proposed work the information in the current and Pending section. Than one page in length on preparation of renewal proposals relevant solicitation or Dear Colleague Letter be included Revised! Elevators, or methods/procedures type of request are provided below limitation has increased to 3 pages as costs. Grants Policy statement, Revised October 2019: their proposal a proposal PIN a! Multiple organizations will not be accepted see proposal with fieldwork in Chapter V.A the. Submitted as a direct cost table identifies where these disclosures must be no larger than standard paper... Proposal with fieldwork in Chapter V.A of the first years budget treated as direct costs, NSF award funds be. Proposal in Research.gov ( if applicable ): Chapter II.D.2.i ( i ) should consulted. Using either email or the ProSPCT form up to 5 products per product.! As in project reports in Research.gov are advisory to NSF described in the current negotiated rate resources, such should! Assess PI capacity and potential overlap/duplication mechanism in Place ( i.e., sub-account code ) differentiate... Consulted to prepare this portion of the Antarctic nsf statement of potential overlap solicitation knowledge generated the! 2023 implementation of their proposal a proposal PIN support if payment is through... The Antarctic Research solicitation participation in NSF-supported projects by persons with disabilities, the costs of identifying, but providing.